That way hardware familiarity, high quality control, and service integration would no longer be an issue.Īs far as what to do right now, I wouldn’t have changed the reveal, people would have got their knickers in a twist regardless. I’d invest in a several smaller companies and start working on agreements with EA, Ubisoft, Activision, Rockstar, and other Western developers/publishers to build agreements where Nintendo ports and publishes the third party games themselves.

If I were in charge of Nintendo, I’d assume third parties aren’t going to port their games themselves. I’m sorry, I just didn’t have time to write this during the week. It’s not publishers that are at fault for all that, it’s us! Especially when you look at the end of year charts from the UK and USA and realise that nobody is buying anything but sequels. But increasingly I think that indie gaming is the only really creative and innovative part of games nowadays. I mean, I assume that’s any chance of Gravity Rush 3 right out the window as well as any plans to make anything even remotely similar in terms of not being an angry, violent video game for angry, violent men. If they don’t care they don’t care I guess, that’s nobody’s business but theirs, but it does make me worry that the more expensive games get to make the more games like Gravity Rush 2 are not going to get made any more.

At some point I think we just have to face the fact that most people don’t really have any interest in playing anything but the same three or four games, year in and year out. So Gravity Rush 2 couldn’t even break into the top 10 on what I assume must be one of the slowest weeks of the year? Instead the three-year-old GTA V was number one again, for the second time in 2016.

Any chances for an xcom 2 demo